Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 18 Jan 2002 14:07:52 -0800 (PST)
From:      "Andrew P. Lentvorski" <bsder@allcaps.org>
To:        <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Cc:        "Brandon D. Valentine" <bandix@looksharp.net>, <penglish@hydro.washington.edu>, <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Two RAID questions
Message-ID:  <20020118140049.A87081-100000@mail.allcaps.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.HPX.4.21.0201181324590.12302-100000@meter.hydro.washington.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I looked at the CVS repository today and didn't note a tag on the fsck
code for -STABLE.

Is background fsck'ing included in -STABLE?  The large fsck times for
multi-GB and TB RAID servers is becoming an impediment to using FreeBSD as
a server (where BSD has traditionally been strong).

If it's not included, what are the issues preventing it from getting
folded backward?

Andy L.



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020118140049.A87081-100000>