Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2014 16:10:49 +0200 From: Tijl Coosemans <tijl@FreeBSD.org> To: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r351936 - in head: . Mk Mk/Uses archivers/libcomprex archivers/libdynamite archivers/liborange archivers/librtfcomp archivers/lzo2 archivers/ucl archivers/unshield audio/gstreamer1-plug... Message-ID: <20140709161049.600ed308@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.2.11.1407090149080.6008@tuna.site> References: <201404231325.s3NDPHrv045503@svn.freebsd.org> <alpine.LSU.2.11.1406301209040.30120@tuna.site> <20140702164609.000d0561@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <alpine.LSU.2.11.1407090149080.6008@tuna.site>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 9 Jul 2014 01:52:56 +0200 (CEST) Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Jul 2014, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
>>> - ${RM} -f ${STAGEDIR}${TARGLIB}/*.la
>>> ${RM} -f ${STAGEDIR}${PREFIX}/man/man7/*
>>> ${RM} -f ${STAGEDIR}${PREFIX}/bin/rebuild-gcj-db${SUFFIX} \
>>> ${STAGEDIR}${PREFIX}/man/man1/rebuild-gcj-db${SUFFIX}.1
>> The problem is that you create plist in post-install while USES=libtool
>> only removes .la files after staging. I'm thinking of moving the
>> patch-lafiles target right before post-stage so you can create plist in
>> post-stage, but for now you'll have to keep the RM (together with
>> USES=libtool).
>
> I looked into this further and tested various patches. It turns out
> the lang/gcc* had some *.la left over which I now removed as well (for
> lang/gcc410 today, others in the coming days).
>
> The primary difference I can see if I add USES=libtool on top is that
> I get a couple of libraries like the following ones:
>
> prefix/gcc410/lib/gcc410/libstdc++.so.6.0.21
> prefix/gcc410/lib/gcc410/libstdc++.so.6.0.21-gdb.py
> prefix/gcc410/lib/gcc410/libcilkrts.so.5.0.0
> prefix/gcc410/lib/gcc410/libssp.so.0.0.0
> prefix/gcc410/lib/gcc410/libquadmath.so.0.0.0
> prefix/gcc410/lib/gcc410/libgfortran.so.3.0.0
> prefix/gcc410/lib/gcc410/libobjc.so.4.0.0
> prefix/gcc410/lib/gcc410/libgcj.so.15.0.0
> prefix/gcc410/lib/gcc410/libgij.so.15.0.0
> prefix/gcc410/lib/gcc410/libgcj-tools.so.15.0.0
> prefix/gcc410/lib/gcc410/libgomp.so.1.0.0
> prefix/gcc410/lib/gcc410/libitm.so.1.0.0
> prefix/gcc410/lib/gcc410/libatomic.so.1.1.0
> prefix/gcc410/libexec/gcc410/gcc/i386-portbld-freebsd10.0/4.10.0/liblto_plugin.so.0.0.0
>
> So, should I still add USES=libtool to these ports?
Yes. This new version scheme reduces future library version bumps.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140709161049.600ed308>