Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 30 Jun 2011 22:14:44 -0700
From:      Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org>
To:        "Andrey V. Elsukov" <ae@freebsd.org>
Cc:        svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r223666 - in head: sbin/ipfw sys/netinet sys/netinet/ipfw
Message-ID:  <4E0D57C4.4070502@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <201106291006.p5TA6w0m089164@svn.freebsd.org>
References:  <201106291006.p5TA6w0m089164@svn.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 6/29/11 3:06 AM, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
> Author: ae
> Date: Wed Jun 29 10:06:58 2011
> New Revision: 223666
> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/223666
>
> Log:
>    Add new rule actions "call" and "return" to ipfw. They make
>    possible to organize subroutines with rules.
>
>    The "call" action saves the current rule number in the internal
>    stack and rules processing continues from the first rule with
>    specified number (similar to skipto action). If later a rule with
>    "return" action is encountered, the processing returns to the first
>    rule with number of "call" rule saved in the stack plus one or higher.
>
>    Submitted by:	Vadim Goncharov
>    Discussed by:	ipfw@, luigi@
>
> Modified:
what happens if the return target is removed in the meanwhile?




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4E0D57C4.4070502>