Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 21 Nov 2000 00:34:06 -0800
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Trevor Johnson <trevor@jpj.net>
Cc:        security-officer@FreeBSD.org, security@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: New security policy for FreeBSD 3.x
Message-ID:  <20001121003406.A95525@citusc17.usc.edu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.4.21.0011210233230.17837-100000@blues.jpj.net>; from trevor@jpj.net on Tue, Nov 21, 2000 at 02:53:43AM -0500
References:  <20001120035146.0020937B479@hub.freebsd.org> <Pine.BSI.4.21.0011210233230.17837-100000@blues.jpj.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Nov 21, 2000 at 02:53:43AM -0500, Trevor Johnson wrote:
> > Due to the frequent difficulties encountered in fixing the old code
> > contained in FreeBSD 3.x, we will no longer be requiring security
> > problems to be fixed in that branch prior to the release of an
> > advisory that also pertains to FreeBSD 4.x.  In recent months this
> > requirement has led to delays in the release of advisories, which
> > negatively impacts users of the current FreeBSD release branch
> > (FreeBSD 4.x).
>=20
> IMO an advisory can be useful even when no fix is available, because it
> alerts the sysadmin to the fact that something is unsafe.  Usually some
> defensive action can be taken.  The problems with ncurses were reported on
> Bugtraq in April (and FreeBSD was said to be vulnerable), but a fixed
> version was not available until October.  IMO that is too long a
> wait.  Therefore I suggest making this new policy of not waiting a general
> one, rather than just for RELENG_3.

This is untrue - we were informed by Jouko Pynonnen on 2 Oct 2000,
which is about the time it hit bugtraq, it was fixed 7 days later by
the vendor and we imported it 2 days after that. You must be referring
to some other problem. However, your general point is taken and it's
something we'll consider.

Kris

--VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iEYEARECAAYFAjoaM34ACgkQWry0BWjoQKX5rQCbBV211YeOuTOehM7o5uiadBuq
R6sAnRBZuuc6zy4bW0VOKlIPfAIX6cHs
=pSVJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb--


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001121003406.A95525>