Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 16:09:01 +0200 From: Willem Jan Withagen <wjw@digiware.nl> To: Andriy Gapon <avg@icyb.net.ua> Cc: stable@freebsd.org, fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Still getting kmem exhausted panic Message-ID: <4CA1F6FD.5090807@digiware.nl> In-Reply-To: <4CA1F6A0.20109@icyb.net.ua> References: <4CA1D06C.9050305@digiware.nl> <20100928115047.GA62142@icarus.home.lan> <4CA1ECCC.4070801@digiware.nl> <4CA1F1B4.1020700@icyb.net.ua> <4CA1F570.6000602@digiware.nl> <4CA1F6A0.20109@icyb.net.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 28-9-2010 16:07, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 28/09/2010 17:02 Willem Jan Withagen said the following: >> I do have (read) this document, but still that doesn't really give you >> guidelines for tuning on FreeBSD. It is a fileserver without any serious >> other apps. >> I was using "auto-tuned", and that crashed my box. That is what started >> this whole thread. > > Well, as I've said, in my opinion FreeBSD-specific tuning ends at setting kmem size. > I consider that a useful statement. - --WjW -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJMofb9AAoJEP4k4K6R6rBhqaUH/iFd1GG/pGLEKY+savwCRQDA iitWtiBnUVfscP3Cfy81Mrg0m3SNik+lgRD2ywC03jsE+6sJbExuw52G46RjpExc EleJZTW74KvbLHBnVQd+gWUoULKfGx4sZSBuYlkFpANhbrucpYmyPftbpFzmpD7N IOeeY6H7iOa4vnb03DLYY0iErL+ak8NtiSKqYTLYqDA/UWqVfOsvdcRbywrMIOoV JoaoD+65ZQpFYkugiFr7/BtcxXA9GJNpsUI+vIADbDgr77XmhKfu0ky4/Ci5f/L9 8YbEzhobOtRBTjX4/JAl60ZC2ToPwyZ8F4Al7Kj8r7FJnpnhddw7XlVXqEouJxQ= =X2gD -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4CA1F6FD.5090807>