Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 11:19:54 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> To: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 28461 for review Message-ID: <XFMail.20030410111954.jhb@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20030409221955.GA46148@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 09-Apr-2003 David O'Brien wrote: > On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 05:40:42PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: >> This would work for me. This is similar to how sparc64 defines both >> __sparc64__ and __sparc_v9__, etc. > > These two are not synomous. I realize they aren't exactly, but IIRC, the "clean" versions of the toolchain only define the v9 macro and there are FreeBSD modifications to define __sparc64__ since sparc64 is a FreeBSD name for the arch. -- John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.20030410111954.jhb>