Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 16:08:24 -0700 From: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> To: Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NFS Performance issue against NetApp Message-ID: <4E817B3C-6524-4F7F-943C-8C707BCED610@hub.org> In-Reply-To: <753914397.1123782.1366844549491.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca> References: <753914397.1123782.1366844549491.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2013-04-24, at 16:02 , Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca> wrote: >>=20 > Along with rsize,wsize you might want to try increasing readahead. The > default is only 1. Stupid question on this, possibly, but are the current defaults "sane" = anymore, or residual from 'the old days'? Like, I've read in many = places where you should raise rsize/wsize =85 in what circumstances = would leaving as the defaults make sense?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4E817B3C-6524-4F7F-943C-8C707BCED610>