Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 21:04:55 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Paul Schmehl <pauls@utdallas.edu> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Patching a dependency Message-ID: <20051119020454.GA73364@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <97418346452EB31701798B01@utd59514.utdallas.edu> References: <97418346452EB31701798B01@utd59514.utdallas.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 03:36:49PM -0600, Paul Schmehl wrote: > I maintain the security/barnyard port. I'm working on a new port,=20 > security/sguil-server. The upcoming version makes some major changes, th= at=20 > include the need to patch barnyard. >=20 > Is there a way, within one port, to patch a dependent application,=20 > regardless of whether or not it's already installed? If so, how? No. If you really need this, you'll have to either make a new slave port of barnyard that includes the patch and depend on that, or incorporate the patch into barnyard by default. kris --8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDfohGWry0BWjoQKURArq9AKD4S3gij9rzMfxZa4+XAKzzjVZkeACeOcQB uNj/7pn79MrlM4PI1NA2a00= =kupH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051119020454.GA73364>