Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 13:09:50 -0400 From: Mikhail Teterin <mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> To: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> Cc: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@leidinger.net>, Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@gmx.de>, Michael Nottebrock <lofi@freebsd.org>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: libtool's raison d'etre (Re: NOT installing the .la files) Message-ID: <200606161309.50844.mi%2Bmx@aldan.algebra.com> In-Reply-To: <20060616152208.GA24948@soaustin.net> References: <200606112110.39148@aldan> <200606161102.58509@aldan> <20060616152208.GA24948@soaustin.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
п'ятниця 16 червень 2006 11:22, Mark Linimon написав: > When the new libtool regime came in, aDe ditched the patching of libtool. Not installing the .la files things was -- as far as I understood -- the main reason for devel/libtool* existence. What is it used for now -- why is it better, than the libtool, that comes inside the vendor tarball? What am I missing? -mi > As far as I am concerned, this needs to end the discussion so we can go > back to working on the harder problems. Is mailing list moderation part of portmgr powers?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200606161309.50844.mi%2Bmx>