Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 15:38:01 +0000 From: James R Grinter <jrg@watching.org> To: Shawn Kelley <shkelley1971@hotmail.com> Cc: linux-admin@vger.kernel.org, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Port numbers Message-ID: <20010220153801.A27501@ns.gbnet.net> In-Reply-To: <F106Sl1q4gtopWd7KKQ000092b4@hotmail.com>; from shkelley1971@hotmail.com on Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 03:18:31PM -0000 References: <F106Sl1q4gtopWd7KKQ000092b4@hotmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 03:18:31PM -0000, Shawn Kelley wrote: > The RFC's will provide you the most comprehensive list of port numbers > available...and a lot more information... > > http://www.thornberg.com/firewall/rfc1700.htm Do you see any napster ports marked in there? Any common trojan ports? Proprietary but common protocol ports? Alternative uses for assigned ports? nope. and that's the sort of knowledge that the portsdb project aims to collate into one place. (incidentally, 1700 is very old. As another poster to this thread said, the IANA list ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/iana/assignments/port-numbers is the canonical source of IANA assigned ports.) James. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010220153801.A27501>