Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 15:49:17 -0000 From: "Shawn Kelley" <shkelley1971@hotmail.com> To: jrg@watching.org Cc: linux-admin@vger.kernel.org, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Port numbers Message-ID: <F230zJUePldjMqV5jjd0000533e@hotmail.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
True. However it is still a valid & useful list regarless of its age. And I do believe the original request was for "comprehensive list of port numbers." :-) Shawn >From: James R Grinter <jrg@watching.org> >To: Shawn Kelley <shkelley1971@hotmail.com> >CC: linux-admin@vger.kernel.org, questions@freebsd.org >Subject: Re: Port numbers >Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 15:38:01 +0000 > >On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 03:18:31PM -0000, Shawn Kelley wrote: > > The RFC's will provide you the most comprehensive list of port numbers > > available...and a lot more information... > > > > http://www.thornberg.com/firewall/rfc1700.htm > >Do you see any napster ports marked in there? >Any common trojan ports? >Proprietary but common protocol ports? >Alternative uses for assigned ports? > >nope. > >and that's the sort of knowledge that the portsdb project aims to collate >into one place. > >(incidentally, 1700 is very old. As another poster to this thread >said, the IANA list >ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/iana/assignments/port-numbers >is the canonical source of IANA assigned ports.) > >James. _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?F230zJUePldjMqV5jjd0000533e>