Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 01:36:24 +0200 From: Christian Brueffer <chris@unixpages.org> To: Ceri Davies <setantae@submonkey.net>, Tom Rhodes <trhodes@freebsd.org>, Murray Stokely <murray@freebsd.org>, DougB@freebsd.org, cvs-doc@freebsd.org, brueffer@freebsd.org, doc-committers@freebsd.org, blackend@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: www/en docs.sgml Message-ID: <20030416233624.GE601@unixpages.org> In-Reply-To: <20030414102641.GA20821@submonkey.net> References: <200304082353.h38NrZXM010842@repoman.freebsd.org> <20030412183216.Z43794@freebsdmall.com> <20030413145741.S28372@znfgre.tberna.bet> <20030414062201.184a0581.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> <20030413160926.E902@freebsdmall.com> <20030414090745.134dc8a6.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> <20030414025924.GA16894@HAL9000.homeunix.com> <20030414102641.GA20821@submonkey.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--rz+pwK2yUstbofK6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 11:26:41AM +0100, Ceri Davies wrote: > On Sun, Apr 13, 2003 at 07:59:24PM -0700, David Schultz wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 14, 2003, Tom Rhodes wrote: > > > Mainly I'm quoting the OpenSSL stuff, and I think some parts of the > > > handbook use `IPSec' also. However, I'm not going to fight with > > > anyone, as the majority of our sources do, in fact use the lower > > > case `s'. Otherwise I'm not going to drag this on. Back to my > > > studies. > > >=20 > > > And yes, before someone points it out, my analysis of `sources' > > > was incorrect, but I can almost swear it was IPSec in the NOTES > > > file... Perhaps I need more sleep. >=20 > > As long as we're consistent, we should be okay. >=20 > Agreed; I've explicitly cc'd blackend on this mail, as he has previously > done a sweep. Since we've already done one, as long as this change moves > to the same standard then it's ok. >=20 > Once that's decided then our choice needs adding to the word list, as > murray stated. >=20 Sorry for diving into the discussion at such a late state, I was out of town over the weekend. I don't really care which capitalization we use, it was just a consistency change. IPsec seems to be the preferred capitalization, so I stuck with that. So the essence of the discussion is to stick with IPsec, or did I miss something? I'll add an entry to the wordlist then. - Christian --=20 Christian Brueffer chris@unixpages.org brueffer@FreeBSD.org GPG Key: http://people.freebsd.org/~brueffer/brueffer.key.asc GPG Fingerprint: A5C8 2099 19FF AACA F41B B29B 6C76 178C A0ED 982D --rz+pwK2yUstbofK6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+nej4bHYXjKDtmC0RAqeGAKDsdt7xQhLMdoW7o/beobWhU+K6TACg76GF fOg/pjrHmfLGpq+JLyU9b9A= =b+SJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --rz+pwK2yUstbofK6--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030416233624.GE601>