Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 23:10:01 +0200 From: Daniel Hartmeier <daniel@benzedrine.cx> To: Aristeu Gil Alves Jr <aristeu.jr@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: reply-to+synproxy versus default route Message-ID: <20061023211001.GA8162@insomnia.benzedrine.cx> In-Reply-To: <2c84c1de0610231349k1c303ff1ie790d498d3ce47db@mail.gmail.com> References: <2c84c1de0610231349k1c303ff1ie790d498d3ce47db@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 06:49:35PM -0200, Aristeu Gil Alves Jr wrote: > he reply-to is not working when it is used with synproxy. Yes, that's a known problem. Packets generated by pf itself (synproxy, return-rst, etc.) don't honour route-to or reply-to options. It's on some to-do list, but hasn't been implemented yet. Daniel
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061023211001.GA8162>