Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 12 Jan 2001 01:15:36 -0800
From:      "David Schultz" <vvortex1@home.com>
To:        "Paolo Landolina" <lando72@libero.it>, <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: difference with linux
Message-ID:  <002201c07c78$39664fa0$0100a8c0@mshome.net>
References:  <000801c07c25$79838330$0a04a8c0@felix>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> What is the difference with Linux?

I'm a fairly recent FreeBSD convert, having used several flavors of Linux in
the past. Hopefully I can offer some insight.

> I've a x86 system (pentium 133 mhz; 32 mb ram; 2,3 gb hdd) and i would use
it as router (via modem isdn)
> and proxy server to share internet into my little Lan. I would like use it
as mail server too.

It sounds like you just need NAT and sendmail, which you could do in either
Linux or FreeBSD. Linux's implementation of NAT is called "IP masquerading,"
whereas FreeBSD uses "IP forwarding." It is a bit easier to set this up in
Linux; FreeBSD requires that you rebuild the kernel. There is sufficient
documentation to do so, but expect to spend a little while reading it.

> At present i've installed Linux Red Hat 5.1 but it seems little speed and
Netscape browser crashes always.

Linux tends to be a bit buggy, but RH is particularly poor when it comes to
stability (except compared to Windows, of course.) Browse through the kernel
source a bit and you will eventually see why. RH 7 is one of the reasons I
switched to FreeBSD. Linux tries to support the latest hardware and
technologies, but it doesn't always do a good job of it. FreeBSD takes a
more conservative approach, but is solid as a rock. You might also consider
other Linux distributions, such as Slackware or Caldera; I think they do a
much better job than RedHat in terms of reliability.

> With FreeBsd is best for my hardware?

If you have any oddball devices, they may not work with FreeBSD. Check the
hardware compatability list to be sure. If you have trouble with FreeBSD as
a result of unsupported hardware, just try a different flavor of Linux. I've
found that FreeBSD makes more efficient use of older hardware than Linux
does, at least on my P120. For a single-user system, however, the difference
probably won't be too significant unless you really put the machine through
its paces.




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?002201c07c78$39664fa0$0100a8c0>