Date: Tue, 11 May 1999 12:52:32 +0100 From: nclayton@lehman.com To: Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami <asami@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: wosch@panke.de.freebsd.org, jesusr@ncsa.es, chris@calldei.com, doc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Can't build handbook Message-ID: <19990511125232.V14492@lehman.com> In-Reply-To: <199905110906.CAA29030@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>; from Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami on Tue, May 11, 1999 at 02:06:20AM -0700 References: <19990508141141.A20366@holly.dyndns.org> <XFMail.990508212539.jesusr@ncsa.es> <19990508231333.45191@panke.de.freebsd.org> <19990510111306.I14492@lehman.com> <199905110749.AAA28713@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> <19990511095232.N14492@lehman.com> <199905110906.CAA29030@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, May 11, 1999 at 02:06:20AM -0700, Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami wrote: > * /usr/opt? Ugh. > * > * OK, that's not the most coherent of criticisms, but I don't particularly > * like it. > > And I don't like /usr/doc. So now what? (I at least gave a reason > why I don't like it.) Yeah, it's "too confusing". Not to me, but then I'm probably not the most unbiased observer around :-) > * Apart from anything else, I don't think we should be hardcoding paths in > * these trees at all. The DOC_PREFIX kludge is only there until the doc/ > > That's probably the best way. Don't hardcode it anywhere so people > can put it wherever they want. Agreed 100%. N -- --+==[ Systems Administrator, Year 2000 Test Lab, Lehman Brothers, Inc. ]==+-- --+==[ 1 Broadgate, London, EC2M 7HA 0171-601-0011 x5514 ]==+-- --+==[ Year 2000 Testing: It's about time. . . ]==+-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990511125232.V14492>