Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 22:11:21 -0400 From: Clark Gaylord <cgaylord@vt.edu> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fastforwarding? Message-ID: <20010629221121.A6512@e028121.vtacs.vt.edu> In-Reply-To: <20010629111830.F78038@sneakerz.org>; from bright@sneakerz.org on Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 11:18:31AM -0500 References: <GPEOJKGHAMKFIOMAGMDICEOJDGAA.deepak@ai.net> <20010626093545.D49992@sunbay.com> <3B3AB4F8.184A2EFE@softweyr.com> <20010629075815.N55750@e028121.vtacs.vt.edu> <20010629111830.F78038@sneakerz.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 11:18:31AM -0500, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > * Clark Gaylord <cgaylord@vt.edu> [010629 06:59] wrote: > > I notice the man page points out that this prevents the use of > > ipfilter, etc. The first packet(s?) do get forwarded by the usual > > process (yes?), so does this imply that at least a "deny X" would > > still work (as the first packet would get denied and hence the > > cache does not get populated)? What are the limitations to ipfw > > and friends working right in conjunction with fastforwarding? > > I really doubt that your assumptions are true. That's why I pose it as a question... Clark To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010629221121.A6512>