Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 14:44:08 -0700 From: Jay <jay@efn.org> To: cjclark@alum.mit.edu Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG, Jay <jay@efn.org> Subject: Re: firewall question Message-ID: <20010709144408.D8562@efn.org> In-Reply-To: <20010704011623.G1476@blossom.cjclark.org> References: <20010702192720.P17514@speedy.gsinet> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0107031039010.18482-100000@mohegan.mohawk.net> <20010704002534.D1476@blossom.cjclark.org> <20010704011623.G1476@blossom.cjclark.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20010704011623.G1476@blossom.cjclark.org>,
"Crist J. Clark" <cristjc@earthlink.net> writes:
>Anyway, I just wanted to note that I committed a fix to CURRENT that
>actually logs first fragments as fragments (PR 23446). It should make
>logs of -1 rules a little more clear. I plan to MFC it in a few days.
Speaking of logging enhancements, is there any chance
that your IPFIREWALL_EXTRA_VERBOSE patches will be added any time
soon?
- Jay
--
efn systems &c. T^\---+')
email: jay@efn.org Perth-->* |
L_______|
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010709144408.D8562>