Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 23:32:56 +0900 From: itojun@iijlab.net To: Anastasia Leventi-Peetz <leventi@fgan.de> Cc: jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp, net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Message-ID: <13704.999009176@itojun.org> In-Reply-To: leventi's message of Tue, 28 Aug 2001 16:27:24 %2B0200. <200108281427.f7SEROD01073@melle.fkie.fgan.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>yes itojun, you are right with your remark, on the other side I don't >see by all available RFC's about tunneling IPv6 over IPv4, how >can somebody perform it, without such a Link Local Address! >(In this sense it is very relevant what JINMEI, Tatuya wrote) for configured tunnels, there's no relationship whatsoever between the link-local address on tunnelling interface, and the IPv4 address used to terminate the tunnel. jinmei's comment is totally unrelated to the topic, I would say. >I have read about such a tunnel success between FreeBSD and Linux, but >on the FreeBSD there was not the KAME stack. >Unfortunatelly I get no Info on the subject... now, what do you want to accomplish. this is still not clear to me. itojun To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?13704.999009176>