Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 15:09:54 +0200 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: Andre Guibert de Bruet <andy@siliconlandmark.com> Cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] VM & VFS changes Message-ID: <41298.1117631394@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 01 Jun 2005 09:07:29 EDT." <20050601090236.L69811@lexi.siliconlandmark.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20050601090236.L69811@lexi.siliconlandmark.com>, Andre Guibert de B ruet writes: >How would you suggest implementing this? A TAILQ in global scope and a new >struct? That's one option. Doing it as a proper tree might be better. >Did you get a chance to look at the patch? Do you have additional comments >on it? Sorry, no, I've not had the time :-( -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?41298.1117631394>