Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 16:27:32 -0500 From: eculp@encontacto.net To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is couriermlm still part of the mail/courier port? Message-ID: <20070427162732.nf47ziw4wsgso0og@intranet.encontacto.net> In-Reply-To: <20070427162021.104jy5q9s0ks8cgo@intranet.encontacto.net> References: <20070427122740.agpicxmj48ookw8w@intranet.encontacto.net> <200704272022.56099.freebsd-ports@dino.sk> <20070427162021.104jy5q9s0ks8cgo@intranet.encontacto.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Quoting eculp@encontacto.net: > Quoting Milan Obuch <freebsd-ports@dino.sk>: > >> On Friday 27 April 2007 19:27:40 eculp@encontacto.net wrote: >>> IIRC, couriermlm has always been a part of the mail/courier port. Has >>> it been removed in the new version? If so, will it be a separate port? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> ed >>> >> >> What makes you believe it is not? I see no reason for this. >> Regards, >> Milan > > The reason being that on a portmaster -a -u this morning I thought =20 > that I saw that the www/courier port was upgrading and now I'm =20 > begining to doubt myself because I can no longer answer the question =20 > because if the port is not at courier-0.55.1.tar.bz2 which should =20 > contain the new couriermlm, than I have no idea what portmaster was =20 > upgrading in addition to Authlib. > > Thanks for the question, now I too "see no reason for this" ;) > > I'm resuping just to confirm my confusion. Hi again Milan, I can confirm that my confusion and that I was hallucinating. Sorry for the noise, ed P.S. While I'm at it, is there any news on the courier-0.55.1.tar.bz2 port? > > ed > > I'm > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070427162732.nf47ziw4wsgso0og>