Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 27 Oct 2007 11:14:57 -0600
From:      James <oscartheduck@gmail.com>
To:        RW <fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Portupgrade used to be fun!!!
Message-ID:  <d59e90ab0710271014j4c903eb9x3eab3e5c5b9bce21@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20071027175637.768736df@gumby.homeunix.com.>
References:  <4722BAC1.9030906@optonline.net> <20071027103839.4a9393da@makeworld.com> <20071027175637.768736df@gumby.homeunix.com.>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > Not anymore!  Every time I cvsup my ports tree and I see all of
> > > those ports that need to be updated my belly aches and that's
> > > because portupgrade doesn't work the way it used to work.  It is
> > > not fun any more!  Always an issue, either a port conflicts with
> > > another port or it fails all together.  I have forgotten the last
> > > time I updated my ports without any issues.  Today scrollkeeper is
> > > conflicting with rarian, they install files on the same directory.
> > > Go figure.  Those were the days when it used to work.


What would you like to see from ports? I mean, in the great tradition of
BSD,
let's work out what the problem is and write a script.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?d59e90ab0710271014j4c903eb9x3eab3e5c5b9bce21>