Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 15:01:01 -0800 From: Tim Kientzle <kientzle@freebsd.org> To: Alex RAY <ray@ddteam.net> Cc: bf1783@gmail.com, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GEOM_ULZMA Message-ID: <4B81BB2D.2090009@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20100222004656.3dd2acfe.ray@ddteam.net> References: <d873d5be1002202023w4dfcc8d9o56ec4fe53066f8ca@mail.gmail.com> <4B80C7E7.1090303@freebsd.org> <20100222004656.3dd2acfe.ray@ddteam.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> I see no reason to not import the current >> version [of liblzma and xz] into the FreeBSD base system. I plan >> to do so but may not get to it very soon; I >> certainly would not complain if someone else >> beat me to it. ;-) > > Thanks for that info. > GEOM_ULZMA contain two parts mkulzma and GEOM module. > libarchive can help for mkulzma utility, but how they can help for GEOM module? > I need to know, where correct place for lzma code in kernel tree? I think you mean "liblzma" can help. I plan to import liblzma into FreeBSD base system as /usr/lib/liblzma.a and /usr/lib/liblzma.so (that may change to /lib/liblzma.so), with the headers in /usr/include/. I expect xz to end up as /usr/bin/xz. I'm not familiar enough with kernel development processes to understand the implications there. Cheers, Tim
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4B81BB2D.2090009>