Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2010 15:45:15 -0500 From: Chris Brennan <xaero@xaerolimit.net> To: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Cc: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gobject-introspection can't compile with endian.h Message-ID: <AANLkTi=1fyQq%2BiSoP2-t_mwHEyGv42%2B1yt4RTtatuTrY@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20101227204206.GA88495@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <20101227180047.GA50384@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20101227210430.3096973b@ukr.net> <20101227191915.GA50711@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <AANLkTi=__1d%2BH-XFmOr3Xq8T2h3o=TZNvcb6j9Z7VWhO@mail.gmail.com> <20101227204206.GA88495@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Quite possible my fix is just covering a bloody stain ... if it is, it will only bleed though again in the future. (Sorry forthwith top-post, it's my phone.) -- Sent from my Droid On Dec 27, 2010 3:42 PM, "Steve Kargl" <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 03:22:55PM -0500, Chris Brennan wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Steve Kargl < >> sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote: >> >> > Yep. A web search suggests that anything vaguely X11 related >> > will eventually pull in a GNOME related component, which pulls >> > in gobject-introspection. The search also suggests that this >> > problem has been known for more than year except apparently >> > no gnome developer sees the problem or knows how to fix it. >> >> I had a simmilar issue crop up and it turned out all I needed to do was >> update devel/pth first, problem went away after that... the irony here is >> that I was getting the exact same error w/ gobject-introspection and py-dbus >> (and a few more python modules). I got the errors while trying to do two >> different things, 1) upgrading python to 2.6 and s) installing an audio tag >> editor app for X. But like I said, once I installed devel/pth it all fixed >> itself. > > Thanks for the suggested workaround. My current attempt > of defining WITHOUT_GNOME just died in g-i for the 5th > time. If g-i requires pth, then it should be listed in > its Makefile as a prerequisite. OTOH, if g-i does need > pth, then your suggested "fix" is papering over a bug > within the gnome framework. > > -- > Steve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTi=1fyQq%2BiSoP2-t_mwHEyGv42%2B1yt4RTtatuTrY>