Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2014 16:10:28 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Olivier_Cochard=2DLabb=E9?= <olivier@cochard.me> To: Dylan Leigh <fbsd@dylanleigh.net> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: No more free space after upgrading to 10.1 and zpool upgrade Message-ID: <CA%2Bq%2BTcoC4gTPqGc_V3xv%2BcWxJuB2r8YioH_NLfaj=5xwsaXW0w@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20141116080128.GA20042@exhan.dylanleigh.net> References: <CA%2Bq%2BTcqo2CL%2B00-4RTD1=WStOSYtawwsZbC1tpZ1G9CbiBp_Dw@mail.gmail.com> <20141116080128.GA20042@exhan.dylanleigh.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 9:01 AM, Dylan Leigh <fbsd@dylanleigh.net> wrote:
>
> Could you provide some other details about the pool structure/config,
> including the output of "zpool status"?
>
>
It's a raidz1 pool build with 5 SATA 2TB drives, and there are 5 zvolumes
without advanced features (no compression, no snapshot, no de-dup, etc...).
Because it's a raidz1 pool, I know that FREE space reported by a "zpool
list" include redundancy overhead and is bigger than AVAIL space reported
by a "zfs list".
I've moved about 100GB (on hundred GigaByte) of files and after this step
there were only 2GB (two GigaByte) of Free space only: How is it possible ?
About the zpool status:
pool: storage
state: ONLINE
scan: scrub in progress since Sun Nov 16 07:58:54 2014
4,28T scanned out of 8,78T at 1/s, (scan is slow, no estimated time)
0 repaired, 48,80% done
config:
NAME STATE READ
WRITE CKSUM
storage ONLINE 0
0 0
raidz1-0 ONLINE 0
0 0
ada0p1 ONLINE 0
0 0
ada1p1 ONLINE 0
0 0
ada2p1 ONLINE 0
0 0
ada3p1 ONLINE 0
0 0
gptid/7ef9b7e4-fc4c-11e1-b75e-009c029758a0 ONLINE 0
0 0
errors: No known data errors
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA%2Bq%2BTcoC4gTPqGc_V3xv%2BcWxJuB2r8YioH_NLfaj=5xwsaXW0w>