Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 01 Aug 2004 10:56:30 +0900 (JST)
From:      NAKATA Maho <chat95@mac.com>
To:        openoffice@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: ugly Java dependency in OOo
Message-ID:  <20040801.105630.846937995.chat95@mac.com>
In-Reply-To: <410BB03D.8010603@panix.ecof.org.br>
References:  <20040731133902.H58234@woozle.rinet.ru> <1091284334.28254.9.camel@moonlight> <410BB03D.8010603@panix.ecof.org.br>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In Message-ID: <410BB03D.8010603@panix.ecof.org.br> 
"Carlos F. A. Paniago" <pan@panix.ecof.org.br> wrote:

Hi, all,

> I have a differente opinion. I prefer to use native ports e not to use 
> "linux modules". In that way I prefer to have the native jdk (or the 
> diablo one) not the linux one.
> If posisble the jdk/jre could be an option (to chose with ou without any 
> kind of jdk/jre that is available). But I don't know how to do this in 
> the ports. The people that are doing the outstanding work to have a port 
> of Openoffice in FreeBSD could consider this?

It is possible to remove java by:
CONFIGURE_ARGS+= --disable-java
at 121st line of Makefile.
I know jdk 1.3.1 with several class files is enough to build OOo 1.1.x.

okay I'll consider adding this option
thanks,
--nakata maho



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040801.105630.846937995.chat95>