Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2010 01:40:44 +0100 From: Shaun Amott <shaun@FreeBSD.org> To: Douglas Thrift <douglas@douglasthrift.net> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: portscout-0.8 Message-ID: <20100801004043.GA13097@charon.picobyte.net> In-Reply-To: <4C54B389.1030106@douglasthrift.net> References: <4C54B389.1030106@douglasthrift.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--jRHKVT23PllUwdXP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 04:36:41PM -0700, Douglas Thrift wrote: >=20 > I noticed today that portscout build and rebuild were not actually > updating the portscout database today and apparently hadn't been since > the upgrade from 0.7.4. I am using the restrict maintainer setting to > only get updates for my own ports and in investigating what was going on > I discovered that the INDEX checks for ports and maintainers were using > the wrong fields (I'm not sure if the INDEX format has changed since > portscout 0.8 was written). Anyway, I've attached a patch that fixes the > problem for me. >=20 Thanks for the patch! It'll make it into the next release of portscout. This appears to be an inexplicable oversight, as the required INDEX fields haven't moved in any of the format changes, as far as I can tell. Shaun --=20 Shaun Amott // PGP: 0x6B387A9A "A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds." - Ralph Waldo Emerson --jRHKVT23PllUwdXP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkxUwosACgkQkmhdCGs4epqoswCfTdcNojZq1O4EOrNAD5qZcHag MBMAoIcp4E5E8mZQFUT+vR4JsZWHBvpG =tetd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jRHKVT23PllUwdXP--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100801004043.GA13097>