Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 1 Mar 2011 09:33:38 +0100
From:      Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@c2i.net>
To:        freebsd-usb@freebsd.org
Cc:        Carl <k0802647@telus.net>
Subject:   Re: why does ulpt depend on ucom?
Message-ID:  <201103010933.39054.hselasky@c2i.net>
In-Reply-To: <51ED50BF-C3B2-42C5-8E8A-D88DCC266EF6@gsoft.com.au>
References:  <4D6C829F.6090709@telus.net> <51ED50BF-C3B2-42C5-8E8A-D88DCC266EF6@gsoft.com.au>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday 01 March 2011 07:31:00 Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> On 01/03/2011, at 15:52, Carl wrote:
> > /usr/src/sys/conf/files causes the ucom driver to be compiled into the
> > kernel if ulpt is specified for inclusion. Why? ucom provides support
> > for USB tty.
> 
> Looks like a bug, specifically the second to last line of
> /usr/src/sys/dev/usb/serial/ulpt.c

You are right.

> Also, I'm not really sure why ulpt.c is in the serial directory but that
> isn't a big issue.

--HPS



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201103010933.39054.hselasky>