Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 10:44:51 +0100 From: David Chisnall <theraven@FreeBSD.org> To: squid@peralex.com Cc: freebsd-toolchain@FreeBSD.org, Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: clang sanitizers (memory, address, etc) Message-ID: <B204AF4D-41E6-42A0-B818-78B3D66957A3@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <5268CF45.6020502@peralex.com> References: <5266780F.70201@peralex.com> <BC7223D9-DC6A-4A2C-B245-7CA9CE8FEA1A@FreeBSD.org> <526769DF.5020805@peralex.com> <70880890-4C9F-482E-AF44-0774114320F9@FreeBSD.org> <5268CF45.6020502@peralex.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 24 Oct 2013, at 08:41, squid@peralex.com wrote: > On 2013-10-23 15:10, David Chisnall wrote: >>=20 >> I had a chat with some of the *san people (mostly from Google Moscow) = quite recently. They've refactored most of the code so it should be = fairly obvious where the platform-specific bigs are. In most cases, = it's just some interposition on malloc() and friends, which should be = relatively easy to port. >>=20 >> I'd love for us to have this stuff in the base system, and even = versions of the base libraries (and programs) compiled to use them. >>=20 >=20 > Thanks, I'll have a look. Where can I find the sanitizer runtime = library > code? The sanitizer runtimes are all part of compiler-rt: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/compiler-rt/trunk/lib/ David
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?B204AF4D-41E6-42A0-B818-78B3D66957A3>