Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 13 May 2014 07:19:20 -0500
From:      Mark Felder <feld@FreeBSD.org>
To:        freebsd-jail@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: new jail framework with vnet, zfs and jail.conf support
Message-ID:  <2f171efc50e58d003930369af9e0e544@mail.feld.me>
In-Reply-To: <53720C0F.9010707@a1poweruser.com>
References:  <640993be45d72e4dac19181ae6644d27@dachev.info> <53720C0F.9010707@a1poweruser.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2014-05-13 07:11, fbsd8@a1poweruser.com wrote:
> 
> I think you have made some poor basic design choices.
> 

Let him scratch his itch. Maybe it solves a problem you haven't 
encountered yet?

> 1. Requiring python as a dependent. Thats a lot of overhead just for a
> script. Not a show stopper, but a csh script would have been better.
> 

csh is a horrible scripting language. I think you mean POSIX sh. But 
either way, Python is slowly becoming the language of choice for 
utilities...





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2f171efc50e58d003930369af9e0e544>