Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 9 Sep 2014 11:51:26 +0200
From:      Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Piotr Kubaj <pkubaj@riseup.net>
Cc:        freebsd-gecko@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: Firefox 32 in
Message-ID:  <20140909095126.GL6096@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net>
In-Reply-To: <540ECAF8.2090003@riseup.net>
References:  <540EA6B2.4090606@riseup.net> <20140909083643.GJ6096@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <540EBD00.3020100@riseup.net> <20140909090613.GK6096@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <540ECAF8.2090003@riseup.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--f54savKjS/tSNRaU
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 11:40:08AM +0200, Piotr Kubaj wrote:
> On 09/09/2014 11:06, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 10:40:32AM +0200, Piotr Kubaj wrote:
> >> On 09/09/2014 10:36, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 09:05:22AM +0200, Piotr Kubaj wrote:
> >>>>> Don't know how I messed up, I did a final sync with firefox 32 bran=
ch
> >>>>> and we now
> >>>>> have firefox 33.0.b1 instead of firefox32...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I wonder if I should bring it back or keep it as is.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> regards,
> >>>>> Bapt
> >>>>
> >>>> I've just noticed that myself and wanted to notify you about, but it=
's
> >>>> good you already know.
> >>>>
> >>>> I would just leave it as it is now, betas of Firefox are now quite
> >>>> stable. It just needs too be updated more often and if you don't feel
> >>>> like keeping it up to date at least until 33 stable, I guess you sho=
uld
> >>>> revert it.
> >>>> Thanks for the update anyway!
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Because I have no time at all to update on regular basis and it seems=
 that no
> >>> committers have such time, I have committed the real 32.0 version
> >>>
> >>> regards,
> >>> Bapt
> >>>
> >> You forgot about bumping PORTEPOCH.
> >=20
> > Nope I did it on purpose, imho 33.0b1 didn't stay long enough so no nee=
d to
> > pollute with PORTEPOCH, now if I got too much complain from user I will=
 bump
> > PORTEPOCH.
> >=20
> > regards,
> > Bapt
> >=20
> Next bugs :)
>=20
Committed,

Thanks

--f54savKjS/tSNRaU
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iEYEARECAAYFAlQOzZ4ACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EymYQCfQ7mbAB+81wfRxj12VsT2Fp33
avcAnjHrgp6v9b6GobOt9280uTsPhYAu
=1rsq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--f54savKjS/tSNRaU--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140909095126.GL6096>