Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 16:06:30 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Andrew Reilly <areilly@bigpond.net.au> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: libtool problem or SMP problem or port problem or what? Message-ID: <20040622230630.GA24452@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <6742AF22-C49B-11D8-9BB3-000D93AF6052@bigpond.net.au> References: <02b701c456c3$20f20580$7b00a8c0@Leptop> <20040621070143.GA87493@xor.obsecurity.org> <p06200206bcfc9780b6b2@[129.85.219.160]> <20040621203228.GB99917@xor.obsecurity.org> <p06200210bcfdf8676e7d@[129.85.219.160]> <6742AF22-C49B-11D8-9BB3-000D93AF6052@bigpond.net.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 08:27:53AM +1000, Andrew Reilly wrote: > Hi Kris, >=20 > >At 1:32 PM -0700 2004/06/21, Kris Kennaway wrote: > >>On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 10:05:29AM -0400, Chris Pepper wrote: > >>> At 12:01 AM -0700 2004/06/21, Kris Kennaway wrote: > >>> > >>> > > [root@elf XFree86-4-libraries]# make clean USE_LIBTOOL_VER=3D15 > >>> > > >>> >USE_* are not to be specified by the user, they're only for use=20 > >>>within > >>> >port makefiles. You discovered the consequence, I'll leave the=20 > >>>reason > >>> >for you to figure out as an instructive exercise about the ports > >>> >collection :) > >>> > >>> Hmm. This raises the question, then, of why a couple of my > >>> ports have recently told me to set something like USE_BASE_OPENSSL=20 > >>>or > >>> USE_PORT_OPENSSL to install (as I recall, a vulnerability check was > >>> failing). This worked, although I had to remove an OpenSSL=20 > >>>dependency > >>> in pkgdb -F later. > >> > >>USE_* variables are not to be specified by the user. User control > >>variables are WITH_* and WITHOUT_* (WITH_OPENSSL_(BASE|PORT) are > >>probably what you were referring to here). >=20 > What about USE_LANG=3Den_US.ISO_8859-1? I seem to remember the=20 > OpenOffice port whinging if that wasn't set. Not that that port built=20 > on my system the last time I tried, anyway... There are unfortunately still some confusing inconsistencies :-( The OO ports do have lots of other problems though.. Kris --/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFA2Lt2Wry0BWjoQKURAivLAJ446yCIJdcZMQSF8fbyWs8kMGNsYQCg0MGI g8fVN3YCh70t4TE0vRKZIag= =Ls/u -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040622230630.GA24452>