Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 19:11:34 +0100 From: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de> To: Alejandro Imass <ait@p2ee.org> Cc: alexus <alexus@gmail.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports vs packages Message-ID: <20120109191134.bc1cc68e.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <CAHieY7SZDXaRHWjZi=Af2evUGPZqW%2BvkrUAp5pD%2B8ULgS5D5zg@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAJxePN%2BWrr6K83RGFGERzJGUXc24i95BemPOgxqAJW_2Lsfjpg@mail.gmail.com> <CAHieY7SZDXaRHWjZi=Af2evUGPZqW%2BvkrUAp5pD%2B8ULgS5D5zg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 9 Jan 2012 13:06:27 -0500, Alejandro Imass wrote: > Use pre-built binary packages to install very large > stuff like Gnome, Open Office, etc. Not an option if your required language settings or the inclusion or exclusion of desktop bindings (KDE, Gnome, CUPS) don't match the default options from wich the package has been built. Also may apply to X.org (HAL and DBUS dependencies, if they're not desired or basically useless). Otherwise, no objections. :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120109191134.bc1cc68e.freebsd>