Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2007 20:14:26 -0600 From: "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" <chad@shire.net> To: Jeffrey Goldberg <jeffrey@goldmark.org> Cc: User Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Tool for validating sender address as spam-fighting technique? Message-ID: <E7BEC1A8-11AC-49D1-9C1A-8803ABDB2718@shire.net> In-Reply-To: <F2BD9F36-2B4D-4EA0-9EF1-1C3A627EDA3D@goldmark.org> References: <26face530703101127l558d2db7y54ddb6674d663383@mail.gmail.com> <F2BD9F36-2B4D-4EA0-9EF1-1C3A627EDA3D@goldmark.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mar 11, 2007, at 5:11 PM, Jeffrey Goldberg wrote: > > In this case the counter counter measures available to spammers is > so much easier and cheaper than the verification system itself, > that it's not really a good idea to try such verification. that is always true, at least with existing technology. The counter measures always cost more than the sending of the spam Chad --- Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC Your Web App and Email hosting provider chad at shire.net
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E7BEC1A8-11AC-49D1-9C1A-8803ABDB2718>