Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 21 Jan 2003 17:24:31 -0200
From:      "Ronan Lucio" <ronan@melim.com.br>
To:        "Mike Silbersack" <silby@silby.com>, "Martin McCormick" <martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu>
Cc:        <freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: Limiting icmp unreach response from 231 to 200 packets per second
Message-ID:  <014b01c2c182$b93b5da0$34a8a8c0@melim.com.br>
References:  <200301211600.h0LG08vD022507@dc.cis.okstate.edu> <20030121104626.Y2194-100000@patrocles.silby.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> This is not a ping flood, as others have reported.  ICMP unreach packets
> are sent in response to incoming UDP packets to a port which has no
> service running on it.
> 
> Here's what's happening:
> 
> 1.  BIND crashes.
> 2.  DNS requests keep coming in, at a rate of 231 per second.
> 3.  FreeBSD limits the number of icmp unreach responses, and tells you.
> 4.  You restart BIND, and messages go away.
> 
> I can't answer why step #1 occured, but I can assure you that #2 through
> #4 are natural results of #1, and are nothing to worry about it.

I think a good solution is install a DJB DNS Cache and leave it
just to answer DNS queries.
The dnscache machine could even point to a DNS Server running
Bind9.

http://cr.yp.to/djbdns.html

Ronan


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?014b01c2c182$b93b5da0$34a8a8c0>