Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 14:39:38 -0500 From: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> To: Franz Klammer <klammer@webonaut.com> Cc: FreeBSD GNOME Users <gnome@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Nautilus 2.5.3 Message-ID: <1071085178.769.30.camel@gyros> In-Reply-To: <3FD77547.8020709@webonaut.com> References: <20031210074908.GA96681@wolverine.home.net> <oprzyj3rr68ckrg5@smtp.central.cox.net> <1071064474.19033.6.camel@wolverine.home.net> <1071079364.769.13.camel@gyros> <3FD77547.8020709@webonaut.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-C1iSJ+rTNpVhyYzKSeYV Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2003-12-10 at 14:34, Franz Klammer wrote: > Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: >=20 > >On Wed, 2003-12-10 at 08:54, Khairil Yusof wrote: > > =20 > > > >>On Wed, 2003-12-10 at 03:17 -0600, Jeremy Messenger wrote: > >> > >> =20 > >> > >>>Yeah, I get that too.. Tomorrow, I am planning to clear all of stuff l= ike=20 > >>>~/.gnome2, ~/.gconf and etc to see if this issue is still there. > >>> =20 > >>> > >>First thing I tried :) > >> > >>Didn't change anything. I couldn't find a bug report in bugzilla, > >>wondering if this is a FreeBSD issue. I'm submitting one anyways. Bugs > >>in 2.5 seem minor.=20 > >> > >>Posting this from Evo 1.5 now. Unlike Gnome 2.5.. it really feels like = a > >>development release. =20 > >> =20 > >> > > > >I would advise anyone that's submitting a bug in either GNOME 2.5 or Evo > >1.5 to make sure all their libraries are in sync first. That is, make > >sure each binary only links against one version of a given library.=20 > > =20 > > >=20 > i'm doing nothing else as be sure that the libraries are in sync since=20 > i've installed > gnome 2.5 - they bring out updates in minutes ;-) > (the last libbonobo*-update completely shoots my gnome-installation.) > currently i'm thinking about an automated script that does the job in=20 > the background. > but that's not so easy: > a portupgrade -rf <port-name> updates every package in +REQUIRED_BY even > it's not necessary - is there an easy way to figure out the _exact_=20 > names of the ports > they _really_ using the given port? What do you mean? Joe > i know that this could be dangerous - but i think not so dangerous as=20 > the last > bonobo-update ;-) >=20 > franz. >=20 > >Also try to include as much console/error output as possible (if it's > >relevant). Sometimes, you may have to start bonobo-activation-server, > >for example, by hand to get all the necessary output. And, of course, > >be sure to build all components with "-O -g -pipe" and STRIP=3D to ensur= e > >we get good stack traces. Also, anytime you can provide a patch, please > >do so (even if it's a simple header file include patch). The more > >patches we can feed back to GNOME, the more seriously they will take > >us. Thanks. > > > >Joe > > > > =20 > > --=20 PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc --=-C1iSJ+rTNpVhyYzKSeYV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQA/13Z6b2iPiv4Uz4cRAjwzAJ0SY38CUhPy8w1e9o+gEDICqwV9agCglkV4 msjcEOwSOueog5Tb8ymymLo= =cur/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-C1iSJ+rTNpVhyYzKSeYV--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1071085178.769.30.camel>