Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 20:57:45 -0500 From: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> To: "Denise H. G." <darcsis@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Should Gnome2 meta port include security/pinentry-gtk2? Message-ID: <1232157465.1547.20.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> In-Reply-To: <86vdsghdum.fsf@pluton.xbsd.name> References: <86vdsghdum.fsf@pluton.xbsd.name>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-UtobFlniPk/mjcVQVMS8 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2009-01-15 at 21:56 +0800, Denise H. G. wrote: > It seems that without security/pinentry-gtk2, seahorse wouldn't get full > functions, such as adding new names to an existing key. Is this documented anywhere? Joe >=20 >=20 --=20 PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc --=-UtobFlniPk/mjcVQVMS8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAklxOxgACgkQb2iPiv4Uz4f3qQCggqDtsLqJ1XoNZH4K7CJbiFzW wGQAnA19X7+UvPCwRAONBrAzm7OSs2ds =Vmkt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-UtobFlniPk/mjcVQVMS8--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1232157465.1547.20.camel>