Date: Sun, 24 Mar 1996 23:08:01 +0000 (GMT) From: Paul Richards <paul@originat.demon.co.uk> To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de Cc: paul@freefall.freebsd.org, CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-usrbin@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/xlint/llib llib-lc Makefile llib-lstdc Message-ID: <199603242308.XAA02639@originat.demon.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <199603242238.XAA06437@uriah.heep.sax.de> from "J Wunsch" at Mar 24, 96 11:38:05 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In reply to J Wunsch who said > > As Paul Richards wrote: > > > > paul 96/03/24 12:03:47 > > > > Modified: usr.bin/xlint/llib Makefile > > Added: usr.bin/xlint/llib llib-lc > > Removed: usr.bin/xlint/llib llib-lstdc > > Log: > > Move llib-lstdc to llib-lc since that's what lint expects. > > Ooooooooooooooooooooooops! > > Speak to Peter on how to revert this... > > llib-lstdc and llib-lposix are special cases, covering the ANSI > ``standard C'' and Posix lib definitions! > > llib-lc is supposed to be created *out of the real* libc (as well as > the various other llib-lfoo files). That's why i gave up on the topic > when importing lint (see my previous replies to your questions). Our > libc is not yet lint-ready, and simply enabling lint wasn't that easy. Ok, I was wondering about that when I did it. Peter, do you want to simply revert the commit? I guess the thing to do will be to copy the stdc library definition to the c library definition as a starting point and then add the other libc routines. Enabling lint is basically still a good idea because we're never going to get things lint ready without lint as tool to do it. We just won't make it part of the build process for quite a while yet. -- Paul Richards, Originative Solutions Ltd. Internet: paul@netcraft.co.uk, http://www.netcraft.co.uk Phone: 0370 462071 (Mobile), +44 1225 447500 (work)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199603242308.XAA02639>