Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 11 Mar 1997 13:48:16 +0100
From:      j@uriah.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch)
To:        hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Maybe a showstopper, maybe not.
Message-ID:  <19970311134816.TB12296@uriah.heep.sax.de>
In-Reply-To: <1713.858063029@time.cdrom.com>; from Jordan K. Hubbard on Mar 10, 1997 22:50:29 -0800
References:  <Pine.NEB.3.95.970310211652.24717A-100000@mail.cdsnet.net> <1713.858063029@time.cdrom.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:

> I'd very much like to know if others can reproduce this - my only test
> environment for NFS here involves other FreeBSD boxes, and they appear
> to work just fine with NFS.  If we've broken interoperability with
> everything else, however, then you're definitely right about this
> being a show-stopper - I wouldn't want to roll 2.2-RELEASE with a bug
> of that magnitude in NFS.

We are heavily relying on NFS on our machines at work, including a
shared mount of /usr/local (from a FreeBSD 2.0.5 machine), and mounts
of our homedirectories across FreeBSD 2.2 machines.  They all work
fine, and the only problem that came up at some point in time has been
fixed.  (A panic condition, i forgot what it has been.)

I can also mount our Sun without problems.

-- 
cheers, J"org

joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19970311134816.TB12296>