Date: Mon, 2 Mar 1998 22:19:54 -0700 From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> To: Michael Hancock <michaelh@cet.co.jp> Cc: "John S. Dyson" <toor@dyson.iquest.net>, Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>, smp@csn.net, opsys@mail.webspan.net, jak@cetlink.net, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 3.0-RELEASE? Message-ID: <199803030519.WAA26387@mt.sri.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.SV4.3.95.980303120048.927F-100000@parkplace.cet.co.jp> References: <199803022311.SAA14774@dyson.iquest.net> <Pine.SV4.3.95.980303120048.927F-100000@parkplace.cet.co.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I just found out that ODI's ObjectStore uses Transitive Closure > calculations to manage objects. They've got one of the fastest object db > implementations around for this and other reasons. Bwah, hah, hah, hah, hah. (Wiping tears from my eyes..) You've *GOT* to be kidding, right? ObjectStore is fast for a ObjectDB, but it's *darn* slow as compared to a relational DB, like Oracle and/or Informix. (We use their Java engine in our product, but speedy it ain't. And the locking in ObjectStore is useless at best. At least their payware Java DB has the ability to have more than one 'session' open on a DB at a time.) Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199803030519.WAA26387>