Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 18 Mar 1998 05:11:14 -0800 (PST)
From:      "Michael V. Harding" <mvh@netcom.com>
To:        stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   'Code Freeze'
Message-ID:  <199803181311.FAA02549@netcom1.netcom.com>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

I'll have to agree with the below - my experience has been that the
CDs are the LEAST stable releases.  Also, look at this slice code
change - it was introduced either after the code freeze, or right
before it.  The CDs should have a longer test period, maybe a month of
real code freeze.  I realize that this makes things harder for
developers, but the stability of the CD release is very important -
this is how most people get introduced to FreeBSD.

<snip>
Absolutely the worst thing any developer can do is to rush code into a 
release at the last minute.  The current practice of announcing release code 
freezes encourages precisely that bad behavior.  The result to a long time CD 
subscriber like myself is that I have _never_ received a FreeBSD CD that is 
useful to me by itself.  There always seems to be some ugly bug discovered 
within a month of the CD going to press that requires me to use the CD only 
as a bootstrap method to get to current STABLE -- which is always reasonably 
stable, unless Jordan has announced a code freeze recently.
<snip>


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199803181311.FAA02549>