Date: Mon, 4 May 1998 04:21:32 +0200 From: Eivind Eklund <eivind@yes.no> To: "Matthew N. Dodd" <winter@jurai.net> Cc: Matthew Hunt <mph@FreeBSD.ORG>, chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/www/ijb - Imported sources Message-ID: <19980504042132.04003@follo.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980503213401.20104G-100000@sasami.jurai.net>; from Matthew N. Dodd on Sun, May 03, 1998 at 09:41:54PM -0400 References: <19980504032939.07389@follo.net> <Pine.BSF.3.96.980503213401.20104G-100000@sasami.jurai.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I forgot a piece here... On Sun, May 03, 1998 at 09:41:54PM -0400, Matthew N. Dodd wrote: > > Explain to me how junk-buster is different from changing channels when > commercials come up... Automated and complete - and in a medium where you've got an absolute pay-per-view, not a pay-per-percieved-viewer. Switching channels is included in the overhead for television advertising - automatically removing all banners should not be. My friends upstairs are spending 60% of their waking time making content, and are asking for only one thing in return: That you view the ads that are sold in on the pages. Do you feel that taking all revenues away from them is the right thing to do, just because your download of the content might be slower if you don't steal? Eivind. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980504042132.04003>