Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 08 Nov 1998 23:23:04 -0700
From:      "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@plutotech.com>
To:        Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com>
Cc:        "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@plutotech.com>, "Kenneth D. Merry" <ken@plutotech.com>, bill@bilver.magicnet.net, freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: RAID-3 and RAID-4 (was: RAID1 Software vs Hardware) 
Message-ID:  <199811090629.XAA25531@pluto.plutotech.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 09 Nov 1998 16:56:12 %2B1030." <19981109165612.K499@freebie.lemis.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> RAID-3 confines parity to 1 member of the array.  The size of the stripe
>> is not a part of the specification.  In the case of Pluto products, we
>> usually use a stripe size of 1MB which implies a per-unit access of
>> 1MB/N-1 (N being number of members in the RAID group).
>
>This looks like RAID-4 to me.  Where do you see the difference?

RAID-4 adds the ability to do smaller than whole stripe updates with only
touching the affected members of the stripe and the parity.  RAID-3 
concerns itself only with whole strip accesses.  Since we have full control
over the stripe size and know in advance the type of data we will store
and the way it is accessed, RAID-3 is sufficient for Pluto's application.

--
Justin



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199811090629.XAA25531>