Date: Fri, 10 Sep 1999 13:10:26 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@ucb.crimea.ua> To: Boris Popov <bp@butya.kz> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NetWare client in -current Message-ID: <19990910131026.B10140@relay.ucb.crimea.ua> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9909101657370.9907-100000@lion.butya.kz>; from Boris Popov on Fri, Sep 10, 1999 at 04:58:52PM %2B0700 References: <19990910122431.B99718@relay.ucb.crimea.ua> <Pine.BSF.4.10.9909101657370.9907-100000@lion.butya.kz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Sep 10, 1999 at 04:58:52PM +0700, Boris Popov wrote: > On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > > > Is there any reason to not have it as a port? > > > > > IMHO, only the basic IPX/SPX functionality should be included into the > > source tree. Anything else could be available as ports/net/nw-utils. > > An IPX/SPX stack is already in the tree and past year made it more > or less functional. > Read: I fully agree with Daniel. Forgive me my ignorance, but I'd like a quick response: what about multiple ethernet frames for IPX? Is it supported in -current? In -stable? Thanks, -- Ruslan Ermilov Sysadmin and DBA of the ru@ucb.crimea.ua United Commercial Bank, ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer, +380.652.247.647 Simferopol, Ukraine http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990910131026.B10140>