Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2001 19:19:58 +0100 From: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <jruigrok@via-net-works.nl> To: Bill Moran <wmoran@mail.iowna.com> Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Additional BIND ???s (was Re: Problems with BIND in 4.2-STABLE (resource leak?)) Message-ID: <20010127191958.D51681@lucifer.bart.nl> In-Reply-To: <3A72E375.C71C175F@mail.iowna.com>; from wmoran@mail.iowna.com on Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 10:04:21AM -0500 References: <3A72474D.979B84FA@mail.iowna.com> <20010127100200.B51681@lucifer.bart.nl> <3A72E375.C71C175F@mail.iowna.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-On [20010127 16:10], Bill Moran (wmoran@mail.iowna.com) wrote: >Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven wrote: >> >> [snip RAM problem] >> >> >Has anyone else seen this, or have I got some unique problem here? >> >> There were a fair amount of bugs in 8.2.3 betas. >> >> I am in the progress of preparing the import, and importing 8.2.3, which >> is the released version. As soon as I have it imported in CURRENT, and >> after I have done my usual round of testing in STABLE I will MFC it. > >In a nutshell then, you're telling me: >a) problems like this have been seen before No, where did I say that? I merely said that there are a few bugs in BIND TxB. But BIND 8.2.2-pX have problems as well. I just read over the CHANGES and there have been fixed a number of memory leaks. So you might be tripping over these. >b) the solution is to use a different version of BIND Possibly. >That brings me to one other question: >In reviewing the list archives I noticed some early complaints about >beta code being used in -STABLE. The response to this was (if I >understood it correctly) that the 8.2.3 beta code was better than the >8.2.2 stable code. 8.2.2 has had problems as well. And the MFC was done in the prospect that the beta period would not take over 6 months. >The ultimate reason for this question is simple: Should I switch to bind >8.2.2 or wait for the latest MFC? Is 8.2.2 going to increase the >reliability of this machine or am I better off dealing with 8.2.3 for >now? This is a production machine and I'd like to get it to as stable a >point as possible and quit messing with it. 8.2.3 hasn't had problems with regard to security as 8.2.2 has/had. -- Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven VIA Net.Works The Netherlands BSD: Technical excellence at its best Network- and systemadministrator D78D D0AD 244D 1D12 C9CA 7152 035C 1138 546A B867 Misery loves company... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010127191958.D51681>