Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 16:21:04 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de> Cc: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <n@nectar.com>, Steve Price <steve@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ksh93 Message-ID: <20010227162104.A7892@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20010227154226.A36915@kemoauc.mips.inka.de>; from naddy@mips.inka.de on Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 03:42:26PM %2B0100 References: <200102260514.f1Q5EHJ96328@freefall.freebsd.org> <20010226215311.A44937@spawn.nectar.com> <20010227154226.A36915@kemoauc.mips.inka.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 03:42:26PM +0100, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > > I notice that this installs the Korn shell as a static binary. ... > +.if defined(WANT_STATIC) > +MAKE_ARGS+= LDFLAGS=-static > +.endif I am very against this. It is not a bug for ksh93 to be built statically, but the bug is in those shells that are built dynamically in /usr/ports/shells/. Fix the right bug. -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) P.S. What in the world is everyone's aversion to static binaries?? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010227162104.A7892>