Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 28 May 2001 19:44:23 -0700 (PDT)
From:      John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com>
To:        arch@freebsd.org
Cc:        kris@obsecurity.org
Subject:   Re: PAM, S/Key and authentication schemes.
Message-ID:  <200105290244.f4T2iNP21562@vashon.polstra.com>
In-Reply-To: <20010528174728.A39588@xor.obsecurity.org>
References:  <200105251240.f4PCeO612402@gratis.grondar.za> <20010528121804.Q89950@gsmx07.alcatel.com.au> <20010528174728.A39588@xor.obsecurity.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In article <20010528174728.A39588@xor.obsecurity.org>,
Kris Kennaway  <kris@obsecurity.org> wrote:
> 
> We also compile all of the PAM modules included in the base system
> into a static libpam which allows statically-linked binaries to work,
> up to a point (they won't work if the system administrator tries to
> use a third-party PAM module)

We used to do this and probably still do.  But I haven't tried it
lately.

John
-- 
  John Polstra                                               jdp@polstra.com
  John D. Polstra & Co., Inc.                        Seattle, Washington USA
  "Disappointment is a good sign of basic intelligence."  -- Chögyam Trungpa


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200105290244.f4T2iNP21562>