Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 13:15:20 -0700 From: Jordan Hubbard <jkh@freebsd.org> To: obrien@freebsd.org Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: iso target in release/Makefile Message-ID: <20010820131520F.jkh@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20010820114316.A3262@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <20010819235131I.jkh@freebsd.org> <20010820114316.A3262@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: iso target in release/Makefile Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 11:43:16 -0700 > You didn't MFC the iso.1 target. We are all building releases on > RELENG_4 right now :-) (-current releases have been broken for quite a > while). Thus my patch was developed on RELENG_4 and only committed to > current so I could as the RE about MFC'ing it. Uh, no offense, but that explanation makes absolutely NO sense whatsoever! If you'd developed something independently in RELENG_4 and only considered it applicable to that branch, then it would NOT go into -current for obvious reasons, especially if it was a duplication of something already there. What you'd do instead is either commit it only to RELENG_4 (and there is some precedent for that) or you'd ask for an MFC of the feature which was already in -current. Please back this out, it's ugly and wrong. Thanks! I'll be happy to MFC the pre-existing stuff if such is wanted. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010820131520F.jkh>