Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 00:32:23 +0700 From: budsz <budsz@kumprang.or.id> To: "Jack L. Stone" <jackstone@sage-one.net> Cc: FreeBSD-Questions <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: About rc.firewall Message-ID: <20021015173223.GA2352@kumprang.or.id> In-Reply-To: <3.0.5.32.20021015103018.0136e5e8@mail.sage-one.net> References: <200210151023430685.13684C4D@home.24cl.com> <20021015135723.GA1427@kumprang.or.id> <200210151023430685.13684C4D@home.24cl.com> <3.0.5.32.20021015103018.0136e5e8@mail.sage-one.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 10:30:18AM -0500, Jack L. Stone wrote: >Designating the type "open" will make your system set up wide open and can >be useful when debugging the rc.firewall script and the kernel has been >compiled to "deny all". If you want to the rc.firewall to load and bee >effective though, you must modify it for your own use, incuding the proper >designations of interfaces, ports, and rules. Sorry, I mean is:=20 What is the relation between firewall_type in /etc/rc.conf and the same statement; firewall_type in rc.firewall? Is it enough if i only define the firewall_type just once; In rc.firewall only? --=20 budsz --SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE9rFEm9kxLTmJpUwQRArU/AJ9+1lT4CX/fRwCHBuCBh1XmdLxEawCeKU+t nriPCY5AXlHUKDVYbrfPfFY= =8dYt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021015173223.GA2352>