Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 08 Aug 2003 16:22:11 -0700
From:      bmah@FreeBSD.org (Bruce A. Mah)
To:        Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: Hardware notes 
Message-ID:  <200308082322.h78NMBmh056880@intruder.kitchenlab.org>
In-Reply-To: <20030808123638.592340a0.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> 
References:  <200308081630.h78GU4mh051520@intruder.kitchenlab.org> <20030808123638.592340a0.trhodes@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--==_Exmh_-1827877734P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

If memory serves me right, Tom Rhodes wrote:

[Bruce wants to eviscerate the hardware notes]

> My thoughts on this, which have been kicked around over and over again
> in my mind, are similar.  My idea was:
> 
> List class
>   List description (small)
>     Tell user to review said manual page.
>       Plea to developers/manual page authors to list supported devices
>       in the appropriate manual page.
> 
> This would perhaps make it easier for users to figure out if their
> devices are supported or not.

I'm presuming we don't have to "talk to the users" for every single 
device.  Putting that information up front is probably sufficient.

> > A disadvantage is that if someone has a random device (where they don't
> > know anything about it other than its name), it's not immediately
> > obvious what driver would support it.  Perhaps more descriptive
> > annotations would help here.
> 
> Where I put (small) for the description, you could list that:
> 
> USB Devices
>   umass(4)
>     Driver for USB mass storage devices, zip drives, USB hard drives, etc.
> 
> Or perhaps this could be the other way around:
> 
> USB Devices:
>   Mass storage, zip drives, USB hard drives, etc.
>     See the umass(4) manual page for a complete description.

Either one of those.  Actually the existing format we have now *mostly*
works once you take out all of the <itemizedlist></itemizedlist>
thingeys.

> > 
> > Thoughts?
> 
> See above, perhaps you and I are on a different wavelink but this
> sounds like a good idea which should be fleshed out.

I think we're closer than you think.  :-)

Bruce.



--==_Exmh_-1827877734P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5+ 20020506

iD8DBQE/NDCi2MoxcVugUsMRAjx4AKCSFLLxFGi5cIrlGMDfu2FGgXQkpwCdEf5s
iNaNG9sj8piyLItBzGhFVpo=
=86if
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--==_Exmh_-1827877734P--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200308082322.h78NMBmh056880>