Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 04:39:08 +0100 From: Harald Schmalzbauer <h@schmalzbauer.de> To: current@freebsd.org Subject: init and USB oddities-ULE-ATA Message-ID: <200311170439.13103@harrymail>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Boundary-02=_hLEu/JUy3KFhJ+/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: signed data Content-Disposition: inline Salve, since about one day "kill 1" and "init 1" don't work anymore! Now I don't know how to change to single user mode from normal boot now.=20 Usually I do installworld in singleuser mode. Then I see the following lines on dmesg which I don't know how to hanlde: 1) warning: KLD '/boot/kernel/linprocfs.ko' is newer than the linker.hints file perhaps recompiling linux-base? 2) module_register: module uhub/ums already exists! Module uhub/ums failed to register: 17 Then I still have the problem that hw.ata.atapi_dma=3D1 seems to have no ef= fect. When I do "atacontrol mode 1" I get: cale:/home/harry# atacontrol mode 1 Master =3D PIO4 Slave =3D BIOSPIO But "sysctl hw.ata.atapi_dma" showes: cale:/home/harry# sysctl hw.ata.atapi_dma hw.ata.atapi_dma: 1 Setting UDMA33 with atacontrol is working. Although it's easy to add a=20 rc.local which does that task it's not the intetion of sysctls I think. Next I'd like to report is what I already mentioned in "ULE and very bad=20 responsiveness" I followed Jeff Roberson hint and ran setiathome with nice 20. But this did= n't=20 really change anything. With ULE and setiathome in the backgroug it's almost impossible to wait unt= il=20 a simple "make clean" from ports is done. I waited at least a quater of an= =20 hour where SCHED_4BSD needs about 15 Seconds (aof course, also running seti= =20 in the backgorund) Even if I don't have seti running I can _feel_ significantly difference=20 between ULE and 4BSD. ULE feels more sluggish with daily work under kde314= =20 and if you wan't to replay two mpegs at the same time it's impossible with= =20 ULE (mplayer) where 4BSD has absolutely no problems (with our without seti,= =20 doesnt make big difference) So long, thank you all, =2DHarry --Boundary-02=_hLEu/JUy3KFhJ+/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQA/uELhBylq0S4AzzwRAvRoAJ9BAVJsmNZQjMua4RIwB5nTWw4NaQCfcQY3 HV9DZ0a8LV2n4l/RBlj5Mq4= =x8lh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-02=_hLEu/JUy3KFhJ+/--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200311170439.13103>